Aetherdynamics


Official physics claims that aether does not exists, it is claimed that Michelson–Morley experiment in 1887 proved that aether does not exists.

However the non-existence of aether raises a whole bunch of questions which modern physicists are unable to answer, as for example:

All earlier aether theories/models assumed that the state of aether-matter is either solid or liquid, however when aether is modeled as solid or liquid then this raises a whole bunch of contradictions to real world experimental facts and this was the reason why aether theories had been abandoned.
However Russian scientist Vladimir Akimovich Atsukovsky (Владимир Акимович Ацюковский) raised a question “what if aether-matter is a gas?”.
V. A. Atsukovsky began investigating this topic and created theory of aetherdynamics (эфиродинамика) in which aether-matter is described as gas.
From the whole bunch of currently available theories of aether the most extensive and the most comprehensive theory is V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics – it beats to dust all competing aether theories.
Nota bene: neuroclusterbrain.com is not the representative of V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics and neuroclusterbrain.com is not the “embassy” of V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics.

In Western world almost nobody knows Atsukovsky because all Atsukovsky’s writings are in Russian. V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics in the most strong/comprehensive/full from all aether theories/models.
It does not matter if V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics is correct or not. What matters here is that other competing aether theories/models are like kindergarten when compared to V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics. So if you are studying aether theories/models and if you have never heard about V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics then your knowledge about aether field actually is almost the same as zero. In Western world nobody has ever created aether theory/model which would be as strong/comprehensive/full as V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics. Not even close. So if you want to find out what is the most strong/comprehensive/full theory/model about aether, then forget all other authors and study the works of to V. A. Atsukovsky. It does not matter if it is correct or not. What matters here that it is the best in the field of aether.
If you want to find out what is the best in the field of aether then go and study V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics.
Yes, there are some inaccuracies in the texts of Atsukovsky’s, however many of these inaccuracies are due practical reasons – sometimes a little inaccuracy saves a ton of explanation. Yes, there are also some errors in the texts of Atsukovsky’s – however what about you – have you never made even a single mistake in your entire life? The more important thing is the general picture, not some little mistakes there or there.
It does not matter if V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics is correct or not. Even if it is incorrect, it is still very good mental exercise to get acquainted with it.
In Russian speaking world there are plenty of other aether theories/models, which are at the kindergarten level just exactly as the aether theories/models developed in the Western world.
In Russian speaking world there are plenty of scientific/physics forums and all these other aether theories/models are crushed to dust by people who call themselves as “scientists”. However there is one very interesting thing going in all these Russian forums – if somebody mentions V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics then there is complete silence as the response, when these Russian-speaking “scientists” go and read V. A. Atsukovsky’s writings they are unable to oppose it, so they just keep silence and/or go and attack other authors of aether theories/models, they choose easier preys for the attack. Or they use ad hominem attacks like for example “hey look, this Atsukovsky is the communist, who can trust the communist? All writings of communists are crap by default.” And nobody is able to oppose V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics itself. That the situation in Russian speaking forums/magazines/etc.

Despite the fact that V. A. Atsukovsky naively believes that dowsing rods can detect aether “wind” and thus dowsing rods can detect so called “geo-pathogenic areas”, this does not mean that V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics is invalid.
The truth is that actually theory of aetherdynamics has nothing to do with dowsing rods, however V. A. Atsukovsky has zero knowledge about the underlying mechanism of the dowsing. V. A. Atsukovsky has zero knowledge about Neurocluster Brain Model which easily explains the underlying mechanism of dowsing. The movement of the dowsing rod is controlled by autonomous neurocluster inside the brain of the dowser, however the dowser has no awareness of this neurocluster inside his own brain and dowser naively believes that some “spiritual force” is moving the dowsing rod. If the dowsing rod is taken from dowsers hands and is put on steady inanimate object (like table, stool, etc) then dowsing rod stops moving. The dowsing rod moves only in the hands of the dowser.
All you need to do is to simply ignore V. A. Atsukovsky’s ravings about dowsing rods, geo-pathogenic areas and his utopias about communistic society.
Just simply study his theory of aetherdynamics – it is really worth it.

Please click here to read about the experiment to test the theory of aetherdynamics (the experiment with a double slit using macroscopic vortex rings instead of electrons).

http://www.atsuk.dart.ru

7 Марта 1999: Лекция в Политехническом Музее 7 Марта 1999: Лекция в Политехническом Музее 7 Марта 1999: Лекция в Политехническом Музее: Эксперимент с делением тороидальных вихрей, образованных каплей чернил

Official site of Vladimir Akimovich Atsukovsky Ацюковский Владимир Акимович (официальный сайт)

V. A. Atsukovsky claims that aether is a gas composed of very small particles called “amers”.
The calculations of V. A. Atsukovsky shows that size of amer particle is smaller than 4.6E–45 m.
According to V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics all elementary particles (like proton, electron, etc) are vortex rings (a.k.a. toroidal vortex) formed from gaseous amers.
V. A. Atsukovsky claims that the formation of a vortex ring is the nature’s only antientropic process.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torus

In geometry, a torus (pl. tori) is a surface of revolution generated by revolving a circle in three-dimensional space about an axis coplanar with the circle. If the axis of revolution does not touch the circle, the surface has a ring shape and is called a ring torus or simply torus if the ring shape is implicit. A torus is the product of two circles, in this case the red circle is swept around the axis defining the pink circle. R is the radius of the pink circle, r is the radius of the red one.

Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_ring

A vortex ring, also called a toroidal vortex, is a torus shaped vortex in a fluid; that is, a region where the fluid mostly spins around an imaginary axis line that forms a closed loop. The dominant flow in a vortex ring is said to be toroidal, more precisely poloidal. Vortex rings are plentiful in turbulent flows of liquids and gases, but are rarely noticed unless the motion of the fluid is revealed by suspended particles—as in the smoke rings which are often produced intentionally or accidentally by smokers. Fiery vortex rings are also a commonly produced trick by fire eaters. Visible vortex rings can also be formed by the firing of certain artillery, in mushroom clouds, and in microbursts. A vortex ring usually tends to move in a direction that is perpendicular to the plane of the ring and such that the inner edge of the ring moves faster forward than the outer edge. Within a stationary body of fluid, a vortex ring can travel for relatively long distance, carrying the spinning fluid with it. Spark photography image of a vortex ring in flight. Structure In a typical vortex ring, the fluid particles move in roughly circular paths around an imaginary circle (the core) that is perpendicular to those paths. As in any vortex, the velocity of the fluid is roughly constant except near the core, so that the angular velocity increases towards the core, and most of the vorticity (and hence most of the energy dissipation) is concentrated near it. Unlike a sea wave, whose motion is only apparent, a moving vortex ring actually carries the spinning fluid along. Just as a rotating wheel lessens friction between a car and the ground, the poloidal flow of the vortex lessens the friction between the core and the surrounding stationary fluid, allowing it to travel a long distance with relatively little loss of mass and kinetic energy, and little change in size or shape. Thus, a vortex ring can carry mass much further and with less dispersion than a jet of fluid. That explains, for instance, why a smoke ring keeps traveling long after any extra smoke blown out with it has stopped and dispersed. These properties of vortex rings are exploited in the vortex ring gun for riot control and vortex ring toys such as the air vortex cannons. Flow around an idealized vortex ring

Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_vortex_cannon

An air vortex cannon is a device that fires doughnut-shaped air vortices — similar to smoke rings but larger, stronger, and completely invisible. The vortices are able to ruffle hair, disturb papers or blow out candles after travelling several metres. The toy consists of a short and broad barrel with a slight taper, closed by a flexible diaphragm at the larger end. The diaphragm is internally attached to the barrel by elastic strips. The gun is "armed" by pulling the diaphragm out, distending the elastic bands, and is "fired" by releasing the diaphragm. The diaphragm quickly pushes a quantity of air out of the open end, creating a vortex ring. An air vortex cannon can be made easily at home, with just a cardboard box. A commercial version of the toy, with a barrel 12 inches (30 cm) wide and useful range of 20 feet (6.1 m) is sold under the name Air bazooka or Airzooka. Air cannons are used in some amusement parks such as Universal Studios to spook or surprise visitors. The Brian Jordan plastic "airzooka"

Wikipedia

V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics predicts that the proton/electron/etc must have the shape of torus with the hole in the center, the shape of proton/electron/etc is not the sphere.

In February 1974, V. A. Atsukovsky’s published the article “Dynamik des Äthers” in German magazine “Ideen des exakten Wissens” in which he described toroidal structures from aether.

In year 1980, A. Atsukovsky’s published the book “Introduction into aetherdynamics” (237 pages) in which A. Atsukovsky described protons/electrons/etc as torus-shape-vortex-tornados.

In year 2003, physicist Gerald Miller demonstrated that one of the fundamental shapes taken by protons is the torus.

http://www.atsuk.dart.ru/online/ether_dynamic_hypotheses/part22.shtml#BankaExperiment

Эксперимент (доступный каждому) Возьмите чернильную авторучку и с небольшой высоты в 2-3 см капните в банку с водой каплю чернил, желательно, поменьше размером. И вы увидете, как эта капля сразу же образует тороидальное кольцо, из которого затем будут выпущены смерчики, на конце каждого из которых будет образовано тороидальное кольцо поменьше, из каждого из них будут выпущены новые смерчики, на их концах снова будут тут же образованы новые тороидальные колечки и т.д., пока, наконец, весь процесс не остановится, пройдя 5-6 этапов делений. Однако это касается чернил, которые, как и вода, не сжимаются.

Ацюковский Владимир Акимович. Эфиродинамические гипотезы.

The advantages of aetherdynamics are the following.
Question: what questions aetherdynamics is able to solve which were unsolvable by other theories?
Aetherdynamics provides solution to a lot of previously unsolvable questions. Let’s list only a few of them.

1) Aetherdynamics easily unites all four fundamental forces (gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear) while modern physics is still very far away from reaching this goal. Einstein had spent his whole life trying to unify all four fundamental forces, however Einstein died failing to reach this goal. However using V. A. Atsukovsky’s formulas of aetherdynamics it is very easy to derive formulas of all four fundamental forces and to unite them under single umbrella.

2) Are physical constants (like for example vacuum permittivity) exactly the same in whole universe or not? Aetherdynamics theory provides an answer to this question. We will remind that vacuum has an important characteristic “vacuum permittivity” which is equal to ε₀ = 8.854 187 817... x 10⁻¹² F/m. If vacuum is “nothing” as it is claimed by modern physics then this raises a question: why vacuum has some particular value of “vacuum permittivity”? Why this value is that and not the other? Aetherdynamics provides the answer – vacuum permittivity is the density of amers in outer space near the Earth. In other words, aetherdynamics provides clear physical meaning of “vacuum permittivity” while official modern physics fails to do that.

3) Does (electrical/gravitational/etc) field of a single material particle extend through the whole universe or not? Modern physics claims that fields of a single material particle does extend through the whole universe, however is it really so? Aetherdynamics theory provides an answer to this question.

4) What is the physical nature of the gravitation? How does the gravitation function? What is the underlying mechanism of gravitation? What is the speed of gravitation propagation? Aetherdynamics theory provides an answer to these questions while modern physics fails to answer them.

5) Do photons lose energy while traveling long distances through space or not? Modern physics claims that photons do not lose energy, however aetherdynamics theory claim that photons do lose energy and as a result of energy loss photons become more “red” which results in redshift which has nothing to do with the “expansion of the Universe after Big Bang”.

6) Formula E=mc² tells that mass can be converted into energy (and vice versa), however what is the underlying mechanism of such conversion? Aetherdynamics theory provides an answer to this question.

7) Why in universe we observe only matter and practically no antimatter? According to the models of modern physics there must be symmetry – the quantities of antimatter and matter should be equal. So why do we observe matter/antimatter asymmetry? Aetherdynamics theory provides an answer to this question.

8) Are all protons in the universe exactly identical or do they differ slightly from each other? For solving our today’s practical tasks we can consider that all protons are exactly identical, however if we will analyze very precisely – are these protons truly absolutely exactly identical or do they differ slightly from each other? Aetherdynamics theory provides an answer to this question.

9) Why the mean lifetime of free neutron is so short (about 14 minutes, 42 seconds)? Why neutron splits into proton, electron and a electron antineutrino? Why the mean lifetime of free proton is so long (2.1E29 years)? Aetherdynamics theory provides an answer to these questions.

Below is the simplified paraphrase of experiment in English.

Experiment with photographic film and chemical reaction which forms covalent bonds.

V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics predicts that when during chemical reaction the covalent bonds are formed, then at the time of the formation of covalent bonds there must be the ejection of the excess of aether-vortexes from the newly formed molecule – this excess of aether-vortexes must be thrown away in teeny-tiny vortexes which are too small/weak to form the electron, in other words, during chemical reaction when covalent bonds are formed there must be the ejection of particles smaller by magnitude than electrons, and these microparticles were named by Atsukovsky as “microleptons”. It is important to note that none of the classical physics/chemical theories predict this effect.

Experiments were carried out to test if the predicted effect exists or not.
In order to test prediction you can use any chemical reaction during which the covalent bonds are formed. The easiest experimental setup for such reaction is acid alkali neutralization reaction.
You can take any acid (H₂SO₄, HCl, etc) and any alkali (KOH, NaOH, etc) – it does not matter which ones, the difference between different acids-alkalis is the different amount of heat which is generated during neutralization reaction. It does not matter which exactly acids-alkalis you will use, because your purpose is to get the formation of covalent bonds, during which “microleptons” are ejected.
You need to take a water-glass, pour into it acid and alkali, stir them together.
Water-glass must be placed on the board which contains round hole in it, and under the board you need to place the (black and white) photographic film which is in the protective black envelope. During acid alkali neutralization reaction the water-glass begins to radiate “microleptons” and this radiation irradiates the (black and white) photographic film which is in the protective black envelope. After acid alkali neutralization reaction has completed, you take photographic film and illuminate it whole with weak light in order to get the background of slight gray color after the development of the film. Then you develop the photographic film (standard development procedure of the photographic films). After the development of the photographic film you will get brighter/whiter image right in the exact place where the water glass was standing in which acid alkali neutralization reaction was going on. Brighter/whiter image perfectly matches the shape of the hole in the board. None of the currently available physical-chemical theories can explain why photographic film contains this brighter/whiter spot. The point is that photographic film can only get darker when photographic film is illuminated with photons, as for example, the illumination with X-rays produces darker spot and not the brighter/whiter spot. And here the effect is totally reversed – photographic film gets brighter/whiter spot and not the darker spot. According to the classical physics-chemistry this effect cannot exist at all, because there are no known mechanisms which could be able to explain it.
Warming of the film was the first thing which the experimenters were very aware of. First, warming of the film can produce only the darkening of the film, not the whitening. Second, as additional thermal-insulation thermo-insulating plastic trays/pads were placed under the water glass. Also additional experimental setup was used in order to detect the ejected “microleptons” – instead of photographic film, the capacitor was used. Capacitance of the capacitor depends on ε0 (electric constant) which is proportional to the density of aether. When capacitor is irradiated with “microleptons” (ejected from acid alkali neutralization reaction) then ε₀ (electric constant) slightly changes and the capacitance of the capacitor slightly changes (which can be easily detected with appropriate electrical circuit). Experiments have shown that during the acid alkali neutralization reaction the capacitance of the capacitor has increased by approximately 3.12-3.4 nF and after 10 minutes capacitance of the capacitor began to gradually decrease back to its original value.

There are some questions which need additional explanation, because even if Russian is your native language – this will not help. There are some important issues which Atsukovsky did not explained in his writings because he overestimated the abilities of average-statistical-reader, Atsukovsky incorrectly assumed that these things are naturally obvious and do not need additional explanation. However, practice shows that these things are not naturally obvious for the majority of readers.
As for example, Atsukovsky intensively uses the term “temperature” which by Atsukovsky’s default meaning is “temperature of aether”. When people listen to the lectures of Atsukovsky and when they hear the word “temperature”, even when Atsukovsky explicitly says the phrase “temperature of aether”, people incorrectly assume that this is the temperature which you can measure with the usual thermometer.
People are unable to understand that: 1) “temperature of aether-gas”, and the 2) “temperature of material macro-objects formed from atoms/molecules” – these are two distinct separate things.
The temperature of aether-gas is proportional to the velocities of flying amer-particles. The velocities of flying amer-particles are different inside the torus-shaped-tornados (which form elementary particles) and outside of these torus-shaped-tornados (in space called “vacuum”). As for example, we can talk about “temperature of aether” in the different parts of vacuum-space of the universe – this will mean that we are talking about the velocities of flying amer-particles which fly in the vacuum-space.
The temperature of material macro-objects (formed from atoms/molecules) is proportional to the velocities of flying/vibrating atoms/molecules. Atoms/molecules can be cooled to almost absolute zero temperature and vibration amplitude of these atoms/molecules will be reduced to a minimum, however this has no relation to the temperature/velocities of amers which are flying within torus-shaped-tornados which form the atoms/molecules.
Exactly the same situation is with the “mass and density of amers”.
The mass of amer-particle is < 1,5E–114 kg. However, the weight of amer-particle is zero. That is because the weight is the product of the mass m of the object and the magnitude of the local gravitational acceleration g. However single-amer-particle is not affected by the gravitational field. That is because the gravity force itself is a “wind” of amer-particles. This “wind” of amer-particles is created by torus-shaped-tornado (elementary particle like proton, electron, etc). When you have torus-shaped-tornado, it creates “winds” of amers around itself, and these “winds” of amers exert force on other torus-shaped-tornados – that is the underlying nature of gravitational/electrical/etc field – “winds” of amers is the mechanism how torus-shaped-tornados (==elementary particles) interact with each other via distance.
When you take a balloon full of gas and put this balloon on "weighing-machine", then all gas-molecules inside the balloon are pushed down by “wind of amers” (gravitational force), these gas-molecules bump into the walls of the balloon thus exerting force on “weighing-machine”, and “weighing-machine” measures the weight of gasses contained inside the balloon.
Gravity is the “wind of amers”, and when the “wind” of amers blows, this “winds” exerts force on macro-object.
Electron/proton/neutron/etc is the macro-object (== very big object) when compared to the size of amer. Proton (==torus-shape-tornado) creates “wind” of amers around itself, and this “wind” of amers exerts force on other electron/proton/neutron/etc – that is the underlying mechanism how two electrons/protons/neutrons/etc interact with each other via gravitational/electrical/etc fields. Gravitational/electrical/etc field is the “wind” of amers.
However if only two amers are present in the empty space, then these two amers can interact with each other only by flying and bumping into each other. If these two amers do not bump into each other, then they “do not know” about each others existence – they do not attract/repel each other via distance.
If you take single-amer-particle floating in empty space, then such single-amer-particle does not create gravitational/electrical/etc field around itself, and this single amer-particle is not affected by gravitational/electrical/etc fields due to the simple reason – the nature of gravitational force is the “wind” of amers. Single-amer-particle interact with other single-amer-particle only by flying and bumping into each other. Single amer-particle does not interact with other amer-particle via some kind of field (gravitational/electrical/etc).
“Weighing-machines” measure “weight”, not “mass. And the “weight” of free-floating-amer-particle is zero. If you want to measure the mass of amers then you need some device which measures “mass”, not the “weight”. “Weighing-machines” are not suitable to this task.

Additional explanation about gravity.
Please download PDF file (“Начала эфиродинамического естествознания. Книга 3.”)
http://surin-ether.narod.ru/olderfiles/1/Atsuk_3.pdf
Open the pages 115-122 of that PDF file, these pages contain the derivation of formula of gravitational interaction.
V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics describes the gravitational interaction as a result of thermal-diffusion processes in the aether.
V. A. Atsukovsky’s derived formula of gravitational interaction is very similar to “Newton's law of universal gravitation”, however there is one difference – V. A. Atsukovsky’s derived formula of gravitational interaction has one additional decaying function Ф(r, t) , which includes the Gauss integral which stays almost unchanged at relatively short distances and decreases sharply from a certain distance. This is enough to solve the famous Seliger paradox because at long distance the gravitational force decreases much faster than the square of the distance.
See page 120, equation # 3.16 in the PDF file:
F = G • (M₁ • M₂ / r²) • Ф(r, t)
This formula also explains gravitational anomalies in the solar system which were experimentally detected at distances larger than 20 astronomical units.

V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics also derives equations for all other fundamental forces (electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear) and so on.
The hole of torus-shape-vortex-tornado acts as the very powerful pump which creates the strong “wind” of nearby amers, this “wind” of amers manifests itself as gravitational/electrical/etc fields, different projections of that “wind” of amers represent different force fields – gravitational, electrical, etc, and this model acts as simple elegant solution of “Unified field theory”.

Torusis a surface of revolution generated by revolving a circle in three-dimensional space about an axis coplanar with the circle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torus

In geometry, a torus (pl. tori) is a surface of revolution generated by revolving a circle in three-dimensional space about an axis coplanar with the circle. If the axis of revolution does not touch the circle, the surface has a ring shape and is called a ring torus or simply torus if the ring shape is implicit. A torus is the product of two circles, in this case the red circle is swept around the axis defining the pink circle. R is the radius of the pink circle, r is the radius of the red one.

Wikipedia

The “wind” which is created by torus-shape-tornado can be decomposed into several components: 1) one “wind” is created in the direction of magenta circle and 2) another “wind” is created in the direction of red circle.
One of these winds represents “electrical field/force” and another represents “magnetic field/force”. When torus-shape-tornado(==proton/electron/etc) blows such wind onto another torus-shape-tornado, they exert force onto each other (push away or attract each other) and that is the underlying mechanism of how electrical/magnetic field works. When two torus-shape-tornados are pushed very close together, then at some small distance from each other, the push-away-force is equalized by the attract-force, and at this equilibrium distance torus-shape-tornados “stick to each other” creating the nucleus of atom – and this is the underlying nature of strong/weak forces which are responsible for keeping several/multiple torus-shape-tornados “glued” to each other forming the nucleus of atom. Strong/weak force is the result of “electrical” and “magnetic” “winds” interacting at very close distances.
The underlying nature of the gravitational force is following – gravitational force a result of thermal-diffusion processes in the aether. Torus-shape-tornado(==proton/electron/etc) creates thermal gradient of amer-gas in the space surrounding that torus-shape-tornado. This thermal gradient automatically means the gradient of pressure in amer-gas surrounding that torus-shape-tornado. The gradient of pressure in amer-gas pushes two torus-shape-tornados into each other thus creating gravitational force.
The gradient of pressure in amer-gas around the torus-shape-tornado is created due Bernoulli's principle – higher speed of “wind” results in decreased pressure.

V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics describes photons as “Kármán vortex street”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A1rm%C3%A1n_vortex_street

Kármán vortex street (or a von Kármán vortex sheet) is a repeating pattern of swirling vortices caused by the unsteady separation of flow of a fluid around blunt bodies. It is named after the engineer and fluid dynamicist Theodore von Kármán, and is responsible for such phenomena as the "singing" of suspended telephone or power lines, and the vibration of a car antenna at certain speeds. Animation of vortex street created by a cylindrical object; the flow on opposite sides of the object is given different colors, showing that the vortices are shed from alternating sides of the object

Wikipedia

That was very short (and thus inaccurate) paraphrase of V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics, for more detailed story read the writings of Atsukovsky.

Below are links to download 5 PDF files which contain V. A. Atsukovsky’s theory of aetherdynamics.
It does not matter if you do not know the Russian language.
These books contains physics equations which need no translation into English, also it contains drawings/pictures which could be more or less understood without knowing Russian language.
Also you can use google translate service
https://translate.google.com
to translate the phrases/titles/terms/etc in these books from Russian into English, just copy/paste them into google translate service and this will you give general, though somewhat rough picture about the contents of these books. Please note that google translate service makes many errors in translation, however this tool is better than nothing.

Below are links to download Atsukovsky’s book “Aether wind – from Maxwell to the present day” (“Эфирный ветер –  От Максвелла до наших дней”) (421 pages).

The book “Aether wind – from Maxwell to the present day” contains the historic collection of published articles (translated into Russian language from German/English/etc) about aether, mainly targeting experiments on the “aether wind”.
The book begins with Maxwell’s article “Maxwell, James Clerk (1878), “Ether”, Encyclopædia Britannica Ninth Edition 8: 568—572”.
The book starts with Maxwell due to the simple reason – Maxwell derived his “Maxwell's equations” by describing waves which travel via aether.

You can read Maxwell’s article in English at the link provided below. The same exactly article (translated into Russian language) is included in Atsukovsky’s book “Aether wind – from Maxwell to the present day” (“Эфирный ветер –  От Максвелла до наших дней”).

V. A. Atsukovsky in his book “Aether wind – from Maxwell to the present day” explains the reasons why the majority of  “aether wind” experiments had failed: the measurement error of the equipment is bigger than the value being measured, incorrect equipment/experiment setup, as for example measuring “aether wind” inside a metal box (Faraday cage) which is equivalent to measuring the speed of wind with anemometer inside the house with the thick walls, measuring “aether wind” when equipment is below the ground in the basement (the same problem as with Faraday cage), looking for the “aether wind” in the wrong plane – the “aether wind” blows from the Polar/North star into Earth's North Pole, however experimental equipment was looking for the “aether wind” in the perpendicular plane, the experimenters were expecting to measure speed of “aether wind” somewhat equivalent to the Earth's orbital speed (~30 km/s) in the plane perpendicular to Earth's rotational axis, however “aether wind” is less than 3 km/s and blows from the Polar/North star into Earth's North Pole, the Earth's atmosphere hinders the measurements of “aether wind” because it creates turbulences of aether wind around the Planet Earth, Atsukovsky provides the descriptions of experiments which have measured speed of aether wind which gave following values – at the earth's surface the speed of aether wind was equal to about 1.5 km/s, at a height of several hundred meters above sea level – 3-3.5 km/s, and at a height of 1750 m – 10 km/s, and so on.


Below are short introductory lectures about aetherdynamics (in Russian).